Displaying items by tag: JAMES EARL RAY

Tuesday, 05 October 2021 04:26

Cotton Coated Conspiracy, by John Roberts?

Jim DiEugenio reviews the pseudonymously-authored new book, Cotton Coated Conspiracy, exposing it as an accusatory and sensationalist volume that accepts dubious accounts with little scrutiny and subverts and hides prominent exculpatory evidence in the James Earl Ray case.

Thursday, 07 November 2019 03:06

The Assassin Next Door Focuses On the Wrong Target

Jeff Carter revisits Gerald Posner’s book on the MLK assassination, Killing the Dream, in light of a recent New Yorker Magazine article which rehashes many of Posner’s narratives and specious conclusions.

Saturday, 21 July 2018 21:53

VICE News Botches the King Case

Entering the current journalistic house of Orwellian mirrors, Jeff Carter exposes the fake news behind VICE News's claim to be exposing fake news, in this case concerning the King family's interest in the 1999 civil trial in Memphis.

Jim DiEugenio takes a scathing look at the various MSM efforts (in particular that of Time-Life) during the past few months to “keep the lid screwed down tight” on the Pandora’s box of U.S. political assassination in the 60s.

Published in General

Martin Hay scrutinizes the responses to his critical review of The Awful Grace of God which the authors have incorporated into their second book, written to bolster their original thesis concerning Ray and the King assassination.

 

klandestine

 

 

Martin Hay reviews «Klandestine» by Pate McMichael on the Martin Luther King Jr. assassination.

 

 

 

Martin Hay reviews the merits and shortcomings of William Pepper's most recent book on the Martin Luther King Jr. case in light of his long career and previous contributions.

 

 

 

 

Jim DiEugenio reviews John Avery Emison’s The Martin Luther King Congressional Cover-Up, which presents valuable information on the case, though its title is somewhat misleading.

 

 

Hancock and Wexler's belief that Ray took up a bounty being offered on Dr. King's life is simply not supported by any credible evidence. They provide no proof that he at any point heard about such an offer and, in their endless speculation aimed at doing so, try to place him in a bar that did not open until six months after they claimed he was there, writes Martin Hay.

Page 1 of 3

Find Us On ...

Sitemap

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.