Jim DiEugenio provides an advance reaction to Brothers in Arms, by Gus Russo and Stephen Molton, as announced in an article in American Heritage magazine.

One thing is clear, if nothing else: there are people who will say anything to promote the lone assassin theory, writes Milicent Cranor.

Jim DiEugenio discusses Dale Myers's reaction to his review of Reclaiming History.

Jim DiEugenio replies to yet more criticisms of his review of Bugliosi's Reclaiming History.

Jim DiEugenio deems the television documentary by Roger Stone a transparent set-up with little that is new and little discussion of the evidence.

The book's use also lies in demonstrating that it may not be possible for one person to fully master, or give a fair accounting of, this impossibly tangled mess of a case, writes Gary Aguilar.

With statements like Mr. Goetzman's, one doubts if Goetzman, Hanks and Paxton really read Bugliosi's 2,740 pages or any of the critical literature released prior, or subsequent, to Reclaimimg History - especially within a month's time.

Michael Green takes Bugliosi to task on the evidence, arguing for a national security state cover-up through the mass media.

Time magazine ran this short piece with David Talbot arguing for and Vincent Bugliosi against.

Letter of protest to New York Times, signed by Jefferson Morley, Norman Mailer, Anthony Summers and David Talbot.