Displaying items by tag: VINCENT BUGLIOSI

Wednesday, 30 November 2022 19:43

Mel Ayton's The Kennedy Assassinations: A Review

A new book by Mel Ayton is the latest in a long line of titles that try, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, to show that the Warren Commission was right, after all. The book is reviewed here by Jim DiEugenio.

Sunday, 14 March 2021 07:05

Truth Is the Only Client

Matt Douthit reviews the 2019 self-produced documentary Truth Is the Only Client, streaming now on Amazon Prime, and finds it has essentially tried to take the modern and improved Oswald-did-it narrative from Vincent Bugliosi and Gerald Posner and then declare the Warren Commission way back in 1964 got it right after all.

“The only good thing about this picture [Once Upon a Time in Hollywood] may be that Tarantino has said he is only going to make one more,” concludes Jim DiEugenio.

Published in General

O’Neill’s book on the Tate/LaBianca murders “does an excellent job in exposing the unethical tactics that Bugliosi and the DA’s office indulged itself in to make sure they would ram the perpetrators into the gas chamber,” writes Jim DiEugenio.

Published in General
Thursday, 11 June 2015 00:03

Vincent Bugliosi dies at 80

by Jack Noyes and Kelly  LeGoff

At:  NBC Los Angeles

Published in Obituaries
Tuesday, 29 October 2013 21:17

James DiEugenio, Reclaiming Parkland

Jim DiEugenio's second book on the JFK assassination, which takes Bugliosi's pretentious and inflated bag of obfuscation as its framework for dismantling the Warren Commission, the Clark Panel, and the HSCA, and for further revealing how beholden the film and TV industry has become to Washington in general and to the CIA in particular.  A masterful dissection of a rotting corpse, and the rightful heir to Accessories after the Fact. [Al Rossi]

Thursday, 03 October 2013 19:14

James DiEugenio interview on Reclaiming Parkland

 On Media Mayhem.

 

Published in Videos & Interviews

One thing is clear, if nothing else: there are people who will say anything to promote the lone assassin theory, writes Milicent Cranor.

The book's use also lies in demonstrating that it may not be possible for one person to fully master, or give a fair accounting of, this impossibly tangled mess of a case, writes Gary Aguilar.

With statements like Mr. Goetzman's, one doubts if Goetzman, Hanks and Paxton really read Bugliosi's 2,740 pages or any of the critical literature released prior, or subsequent, to Reclaimimg History - especially within a month's time.

Page 1 of 2

Find Us On ...

Sitemap

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.